Tagged: Seth Godin Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • Doug Belshaw 5:16 pm on January 27, 2020 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: luck, Seth Godin   

    [L]uck over time is a symptom of productive contributions. It rarely happens when you need it most, it almost never happens in equal proportion to what feels fair (to you or to others), but it happens.

    Seth Godin
     
  • Doug Belshaw 11:44 am on December 24, 2019 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Seth Godin,   

    When there’s a single metric (likes/followers), we end up looking in the rear-view mirror when we should be driving instead.

    Maximizing the benefits for the social media platform you’re on are different than maximizing the benefits for you and those you are leading.

    Seth Godin, The real scam of ‘influencer’
     
  • Doug Belshaw 6:49 pm on July 13, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: journal, Seth Godin   

    Catastrophe journaling 

    I really like this idea from Seth Godin:

    Every time you’re sure you’ve blown it, completely blown it, that you’re certain you’re going to get disbarred, fired, demoted—becoming friendless, homeless and futureless—write it down in your Catastrophe Journal.

    A simple blank book, always use the same one.

    Just a few sentences, that’s all you need. Write down:

    • What you did that was so horrible.
    • The consequences you expect since the world as you know it is now coming to an end.

    Do this every time a catastrophe occurs.

    What you’ll find, pretty certainly, is that two things happen:

    1. You will realize over time that your predictions of doom don’t occur, and
    2. As soon as you begin writing down the details, the cycle we employ of making the details worse and worse over time will slow and stop.

    We all need a bit of perspective, especially me. I usually get mine from travel but, if that’s not possible, this is a great habit to get into!

     
  • Doug Belshaw 9:19 am on March 14, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Clay Shirky, , Seth Godin   

    The failure of pre-filtering 

    Filters

    A few years ago, when I’d just joined Mozilla and become Dr. Belshaw, I ran an experiment. At that point, I was attending, on average, an event per week, so I was meeting lots of people for the first time. I had three variables in play:

    1. My ideas
    2. The fact I worked for Mozilla
    3. Mention of doctorate

    Sometimes when I talked to people for the first time, I’d not mention who I worked for, nor give people my business card (which featured my title). I’d just talk about my ideas. People would listen and give me their ideas on the subject. That was great, but they’d usually done zero work or reading on the subject. Often, people would say what I was trying to do (Web Literacy Map, Open Badges) ‘just wouldn’t work’ for various reasons.

    Interestingly, I found that just adding in one of the other two variables changed that. My status as a ‘doctor’ would often change the conversation. While people weren’t deferential, there was certainly a noticeable switch to “oh, this guy must know what he’s talking about.” Similarly, if I mentioned that I worked for Mozilla, all of a sudden what I was talking about was eminently possible. Taken together, people would often scrabble to think of ways we could work together.

    Funny, isn’t it? The way that I’ve come to rationalise this that people recognise and value ‘pre-filtering’. We all recognise working for certain organisations and having particular qualifications as a kind of shorthand. These days, as a consultant, I get similar results if I mention some of the clients I’ve worked with, such as Creative Commons or City & Guilds, along with my academic qualifications. I’d like not to be just my LinkedIn profile, but it’s what people respond to.

    All of this brings me to Seth Godin, who recently wrote:

    The SAT is a poor indicator of college performance, but most colleges use it anyway.

    Famous colleges aren’t correlated with lifetime success or happiness, but we push our kids to to seek them out.

    And all that time on social networks still hasn’t taught us not to judge people by their profile photos…

    Most of all, we now know that easy-to-measure skills aren’t nearly as important as the real skills that matter.

    Everyone believes that other people are terrible at judging us and our potential, but we go ahead and proudly judge others on the basis of a short interview (or worse, a long one), even though the people we’re selecting aren’t being hired for their ability to be interviewed.

    The first step in getting better at pre-judging is to stop pre-judging.

    This takes guts, because it feels like giving up control, but we never really had control in the first place. Not if we’ve been obsessively measuring the wrong things all along.

    When I talk to people about Open Badges, there’s still plenty of them who are being introduced to alternative credentialing for the first time. The idea that the way we hire people or recognise their knowledge, skills, and behaviours might be problematic, comes as a surprise. In effect, I’m saying that the large filters we use for everyone just don’t work that well.

    This reminds me of Clay Shirky’s presentation almost a decade ago, the title of which is now also a well-known quotation of his:

    It’s not information overload. It’s filter failure.

    Right now, there’s plenty of jobs for which HR managers receive hundreds, if not thousands, of applications. I don’t know in every case how these are boiled down to decide who comes for interview, but I can’t help but think that they’re probably using the same lenses, time and time again. Although it’s not the only reason my interest in Open Badges remains strong, I do think more granular credentials can’t help but provide smaller, additional lenses that lead to greater diversity, and better person/organisation fit.

    Image CC BY-NC-ND Nadar

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
shift + esc
cancel